A former Niantic worker filed a lawsuit towards the AR gaming firm on Friday, alleging that it devalued the work of feminine workers and girls of shade, denied equal pay to ladies workers and girls of shade. The lawsuit, which is searching for class-action standing, accuses Niantic of making a “boys membership.” The worker was laid off as a part of final week’s job cuts on the firm, which affected about 230 staffers.
The worker, who’s an nameless Jane Doe however is described within the grievance as an Asian feminine, began work at Niantic in February 2020 with a wage of $70,000, the grievance says. Later that yr, she was promoted and acquired a increase to about $84,000, however in “roughly” 2021, she realized that Niantic was paying a male colleague extra money although she had the next job title and extra tasks than he did.
In 2022, he was allegedly paid $127,000 per yr, however she was paid $105,000 per yr regardless of being one job stage greater. In or round spring 2023, she acquired a increase to $115,000 per yr, nonetheless under her male colleague.
She realized she was being paid greater than $10,000 underneath her job’s pay vary
Round that very same time, the worker additionally noticed that Niantic posted the pay vary for her job title and stage — as of 2023, California employers with greater than 15 staffers should share pay ranges in job listings due to a pay transparency regulation — and noticed that she was being paid greater than $10,000 lower than the underside finish of that vary.
The worker mentioned her considerations with different feminine staffers, and sexism and equal pay have been introduced up within the firm’s worker sources group for girls, Wolfpack.
However when the worker introduced her considerations to Niantic’s Variety Fairness and Inclusion Director and Principal Folks Accomplice, they “made clear” that “they and male higher administration at Niantic have been hostile to her complaints or voiced considerations about sexism or sexual bias within the office,” the grievance says.
The executives within the assembly additionally allegedly mentioned her job evaluations have been affected by her discussing office points along with her colleagues and mentioned that she was paid under the vary as a result of she had raised considerations along with her colleagues. In line with the grievance, the worker then “instantly unsubscribed” from the Wolfpack group “in worry that her affiliation with Wolfpack would drawback Wolfpack workers or her.”
This yr, Wolfpack present in a survey of staffers that “many feminine workers seen Niantic as a sexist work tradition that disadvantages feminine workers” and a majority of respondents “expressed considerations about equal pay at Niantic,” the grievance says. When these survey findings the place shared with higher administration, “Niantic’s Chief Advertising and marketing Officer, Mike Quigley, required Wolfpack to take away references to Boys Membership and comparable feedback about sexism within the office from their presentation to Wolfpack members concerning the outcomes of the survey.” The group was additionally instructed that they might not survey staffers with out approval from higher administration.
Niantic didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
The lawsuit towards Niantic is simply the newest authorized motion towards a significant gaming firm based mostly on allegations from feminine workers. The state of California sued Activision Blizzard in 2021 alleging that it fostered a tradition of “fixed sexual harassment,” whereas Riot Video games introduced that yr that it might pay $100 million to settle a gender discrimination lawsuit.
As a part of its latest layoffs, CEO John Hanke reiterated the corporate’s give attention to Pokémon Go, its money cow. The corporate has struggled to search out its subsequent huge hit, shutting down video games based mostly on Harry Potter, Catan, and, as of final week, its NBA recreation.